Urban art traditionally framed in aesthetic aspects, criminalization and vandalism, as a democratic scope in cultural valuation

Abstract

Urban art, traditionally associated with aesthetic aspects, criminalization, and vandalism, has evolved into a form of democratic and cultural expression. Manifested in murals, graffiti, and other visual forms, this art reflects the creativity that flourishes in urban environments and communities. This article analyzes the transformation of urban art, traditionally framed within criminalization and vandalism, towards recognition as a cultural and democratic manifestation. The methodology used is a bibliographic study with a qualitative approach. The main results indicate a paradigm shift: urban art has moved from being stigmatized to being recognized as a legitimate form of artistic and cultural expression with significant democratic implications. This change is due to a greater understanding of its potential as a tool for empowerment, social critique, and citizen participation. As a main conclusion, it is explained that urban art has evolved from being seen as mere vandalism to being valued as a democratic cultural manifestation. It allows various social groups to express themselves and participate in the construction of urban narratives. This form of artistic expression seeks beauty and social critique, contributing to the aesthetic enrichment of cities. Urban art, rooted in the emotions, thoughts, and experiences of its creators, provides a reflection of cultural and social diversity. Despite the stigmatization and criminalization, its aesthetic influence and capacity to democratize culture make it a relevant cultural phenomenon.