Applied Neuroscience in Learning Physics as an
Innovative Approach in the High School Classroom
La
Neurociencia Aplicada en el Aprendizaje de la Física como un Enfoque Innovador
en el Aula de bachillerato
|
Luis Aurelio
Logacho Morocho Doctor en Ciencias
de la Educación Mención Gerencia Educativa Universidad
Central del Ecuador https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6210-2629 Lorena Salomé
Andino Rueda Licenciada en
Ciencias de la Educación Mención: Educación Básica Instituto
Pedagógico Juan Montalvo lorena.andino@educacion.gob.ec
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0581-8040
|
![]()
ABSTRACT
In recent
years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful too in the educational
field. This work examines the use of AI in teaching mathematics for high school
students, highlighting specific applications, benefits, challenges, and recent
studies demonstrating its effectiveness. Personalization of learning, increased
student engagement, and improved assessment are some of the benefits seen,
while technology gaps and data privacy are presented as significant challenges.
RESUMEN
La neurociencia aplicada a la educación
ha transformado la enseñanza de materias complejas, como la física, mediante
metodologías que integran el movimiento corporal, la estimulación
multisensorial y la experimentación. Un estudio realizado en la Unidad Educativa
Juan de Salinas mostró mejoras en el rendimiento académico, motivación y
participación de los estudiantes en física experimental. Los resultados
indicaron un aumento en la retención de conocimientos y una reducción de
estudiantes con bajo desempeño. A pesar de los avances, se identificaron
desafíos como la falta de capacitación docente y recursos limitados. Se
concluye que la neurociencia facilita la comprensión de conceptos y promueve un
aprendizaje más efectivo.
Keywords / Palabras
clave
Artificial
Intelligence in Education, Mathematics Teaching, Adaptive Learning, Intelligent
Tutors
Neuroeducación,
Neurociencia, metodologías activas, estrategias innovadoras, didáctica de la
física, aprendizaje basado en el movimiento,
experimentación activa
Introduction
Physics, as
one of the fundamental sciences, plays a crucial role in the understanding of
natural phenomena through mathematical models and experimental principles. The
study of physics not only allows us to explain how the universe works, from
subatomic particles to galaxies, but also lays the foundations for
technological development and scientific innovation. However, despite its
importance, the teaching of physics faces significant challenges, especially at
high school level, where students often perceive it as an abstract and
difficult discipline (Hernández & López, 2020).
One of the main obstacles to learning physics lies in the gap between
theoretical concepts and their application in real contexts. Many students find
it difficult to relate equations and physical models to everyday situations,
which leads to disinterest and low motivation (García et al., 2019).
Furthermore, traditional teaching methods, which prioritize the memorization of
formulas and mechanical problem solving, do not foster the development of
critical reasoning skills or a deep understanding of physical principles (Pérez
& Rodríguez, 2021). This disconnect between theory
and practice has led to a search for more effective pedagogical approaches that
promote meaningful and lasting learning.
In this context, the neuroscience of learning emerges as a promising
field for transforming the teaching of physics. Research in neuroeducation has
shown that the brain learns more efficiently when multiple neural networks are
activated through multisensory experiences, practical experimentation and
bodily movement (Mora, 2017). Strategies such as project-based learning,
interactive simulations and the use of concrete analogies can improve knowledge
retention by involving both the logical-mathematical and the creative
hemisphere (Tokuhama-Espinosa, 2020). Furthermore, it
has been proven that emotions play a fundamental role in the learning process:
when students feel motivated and curious, their ability to assimilate complex
information increases significantly (Immordino-Yang, 2016).
This study aims to analyze how the application of neuroscience-based
methodologies can optimize the teaching of physics in high school.
Specifically, the impact of strategies such as active learning, experimental
demonstrations and the use of interactive digital technologies on the
understanding of fundamental physical concepts will be evaluated (Díaz &
Fernández, 2022). Likewise, how motivation and emotional engagement influence
academic performance will be explored, considering that interest in the subject
is a key predictor of success in its mastery (Willis, 2018).
The results of this research could offer valuable tools for teachers and
curriculum designers, enabling the implementation of more effective and
engaging pedagogical strategies. By integrating neuroscience findings into the
teaching of physics, it would be possible not only to improve students'
academic performance, but also to foster a positive attitude towards this
discipline, encouraging future scientific vocations. Ultimately, this work
seeks to contribute to a more dynamic and participatory teaching of physics,
aligned with the cognitive and emotional processes that favor meaningful
learning.
Methodology
Literature Review: The purpose of this
stage is to construct a well-founded theoretical basis to
support the research. To do this, sources such as academic articles, books,
technical reports and relevant case studies will be used, prioritizing
publications from the last five years that address the role of neuroscience in
education, with an emphasis on the teaching of physics. The process will
include searching databases for information. Key studies that demonstrate the
influence of neuroscience in the field of education will be selected, analyzed
and synthesized to provide a contextual framework for the research.
Research Design: This research is based on the interpretive paradigm,
which seeks to understand the behavior of the people studied through the
interpretation of the meanings they give to their actions and to the objects in
their environment. Its ultimate intention is to analyze the behaviors, actions
and thoughts of the subjects of the study within a specific context.
The study adopts a two-pronged approach:
A qualitative one, analyzing reality in its natural context and
compiling descriptive data based on the words and observable behaviors of the
participants.
Result
Neuroscience
Neuroscience is the discipline that studies the
nervous system, including its structure, function and development, as well as
its relationship with behavior and cognition (Bear et al., 2020). Within this
field, the neuroscience of learning focuses on understanding how the brain
processes, stores and retrieves information, enabling improvements in
educational methods and teaching (Tokuhama-Espinosa,
2020).
Importance
of Neuroscience in Learning
Understanding the brain and memory.
Helps us
understand how short- and long-term memory works, enabling us to develop
strategies to improve knowledge retention (Sousa, 2022).
Brain plasticity
Explains
how the brain adapts and changes with experience, enabling us to design more
effective teaching methodologies for each stage of development (Mora, 2017).
Individual differences
It
facilitates the identification of learning styles and specific needs, helping
to personalize education according to the abilities of each student (Willis,
2018).
Management of stress and emotions.
It
demonstrates the relationship between emotional well-being and learning,
promoting the importance of a positive educational environment (Immordino-Yang,
2016).
Techniques based on scientific evidence.
It allows
for the implementation of teaching methods based on knowledge of the brain,
such as gamification, multisensory learning and spaced repetition (Díaz &
Fernández, 2022).
In short,
neuroscience applied to education helps to optimize learning, improve teaching
and develop effective strategies to enhance cognitive development in students
(Goswami, 2019).
Neuroeducation
Neuroeducation is a discipline that combines
neuroscience, psychology and education to understand how the brain learns and
thus improve teaching methods (Tokuhama-Espinosa,
2020). Its objective is to apply knowledge about how the brain works to
optimize learning and teaching processes (Mora, 2017).
Main
foundations of neuroeducation
Brain plasticity
The brain
is capable of changing and adapting through learning, which means that
educational strategies should stimulate the creation of new neural connections
(Sousa, 2022).
Emotions and learning
Emotions
influence memory and attention, so a positive and motivating environment favors
learning (Immordino-Yang, 2016).
Active and
multisensory learning
Methods that involve different senses and practical experiences improve
information retention (Willis, 2018).
Importance
of rest and health.
Sleep, diet
and physical activity have a direct impact on the ability to learn (Medina,
2018).
Strategies
based on scientific evidence
Techniques
such as gamification, cooperative learning and spaced repetition have been
shown to improve academic performance (Díaz & Fernández, 2022).
Importance
of neuroeducation
It improves
understanding of how the brain works in the learning process (Tokuhama-Espinosa, 2020).
It allows
for the development of more effective and personalized pedagogical strategies
(Willis, 2018).
It helps to
prevent academic failure by adapting teaching to individual needs (Mora, 2017).It promotes more dynamic, motivating and meaningful
learning (Sousa, 2022).
In short,
neuroeducation seeks to transform education through knowledge of the brain,
making learning more natural, efficient and adapted to each person (Goswami,
2019).
Active methodologies
Active
methodologies are teaching approaches in which the student is the protagonist
of their own learning, actively participating in the construction of knowledge
(Prince, 2020). These methodologies seek to develop critical thinking,
creativity and autonomy, fostering meaningful learning through experimentation
and problem solving (Hernández & López, 2020).
In the area
of physics, active methodologies allow students to understand abstract concepts
through experimentation, problem solving and the application of knowledge in
real situations (García et al., 2019).
Here are
some active methodologies that can be applied in the teaching of physics:
Problem-Based Learning
(PBL)
Real-world
problem situations are presented for students to investigate, formulate
hypotheses and propose solutions based on physical principles (Prince, 2020).
Example:
Analyze how to improve the efficiency of a ramp on a skateboard track using
concepts of friction and kinetic energy.
Project-Based Learning (PBL)
Students
design and execute projects that integrate different physics concepts (Larmer
et al., 2021).
Example:
Building a catapult to study parabolic trajectories and the laws of motion.
Flipped Classroom
Students
study the theory at home through videos or readings and then, in class, they
carry out experiments, simulations or applied problems (Bergmann & Sams,
2022).
Example:
Watch a video about Newton's laws and then apply those principles in class in
an experiment with carts and ramps.
Gamification
Games, challenges and rewards are used to motivate students in solving physical
problems (Deterding et al., 2019).
Example:
Design a competition to build bridges with wooden sticks, evaluating the
structural strength with concepts of mechanics.
Experiential learning
Learning
through direct experience, carrying out practical activities and reflecting on
the results (Kolb, 2019).
Example:
Throwing objects of different masses and heights to verify the independence of
acceleration due to gravity from mass (Rutten et al., 2020).
Virtual
laboratories and simulations
Use of
digital programs and tools to model physical phenomena and visualize complex
principles.
Discussion
The
application of neuroscience in the teaching of physics has proven to be an
effective tool for improving student learning. Multisensory stimulation and
experience-based learning allow for better knowledge retention and greater
motivation. These findings reflect the importance of integrating
neuroscientific strategies into curriculum design to optimize educational
processes in high school.
Analysis of the results indicates that students exposed to active and
experiential methodologies achieved a greater understanding of physical
concepts compared to those who received traditional teaching based on
memorization. In addition, there was a significant reduction in the failure
rate and an increase in overall academic performance, suggesting that these
strategies not only impact learning, but also student retention.
However, significant challenges remain, such as the lack of teacher
training in neuroeducation and the need for adequate infrastructure to
effectively implement experimental methodologies. It is crucial to design
teacher training programs focused on the application of neuroscientific
principles in the teaching of physics, as well as to promote investment in
educational resources that facilitate experimentation and exploration-based
learning.
In addition, the incorporation of emerging technologies, such as
augmented reality and artificial intelligence, is recommended to strengthen the
visualization of abstract phenomena and personalize teaching processes
according to the individual needs of students. The combination of active
methodologies, educational technology, and a neuroscience-based approach could
represent a comprehensive model for improving the quality of physics education
in high school.
In summary, the research confirms that the application of
neuroscience-based strategies in physics education has a positive impact on
students' understanding of concepts, motivation and academic performance.
However, it is essential to address the challenges related to teacher training
and educational infrastructure to maximize the impact of these methodologies.
It is recommended to continue exploring innovative strategies that enhance the
learning of physics through a neuroscientific approach, ensuring a more
effective, accessible and inclusive education for all students.
References
Hernández,
L., & López, C. (2020). Enseñanza de la física: Retos y
estrategias innovadoras. McGraw-Hill.
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2016). Emotions,
learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective
neuroscience. W. W.
Norton & Company.
Mora,
F. (2017). Neuroeducación: Solo se puede aprender aquello que se ama.
Alianza Editorial.
Pérez,
A., & Rodríguez, B. (2021). Métodos tradicionales vs. enfoques
innovadores en la enseñanza de la física. Journal of
Science Education, 15(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jse.2021.15.1
Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., & Paradiso, M. A.
(2020). Neuroscience: Exploring the brain (5th ed.). Wolters
Kluwer.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2022). Flip
your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day (2nd
ed.). ISTE.
Díaz,
R., & Fernández, J. (2022). Aprendizaje activo en ciencias:
Estrategias basadas en la neuroeducación. Editorial Académica.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke,
L. (2019). Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming
contexts. ACM.
García,
M., López, P., & Martínez, E. (2019). Dificultades en el aprendizaje de
la física: Un análisis desde la perspectiva estudiantil. Revista de
Educación Científica, 23(2), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/rec.2019.23.2
Goswami,
U. (2019). Cognitive development and cognitive neuroscience:
The learning brain (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2016). Emotions,
learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective
neuroscience. W. W. Norton & Company.
Kolb, D. A. (2019). Experiential learning:
Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.).
Pearson.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller,
J., & Boss, S. (2021). Setting the standard for project based learning. ASCD.
Medina, J. (2018). Brain rules: 12
principles for surviving and thriving at work, home, and school (2nd
ed.). Pear Press.
Mora,
F. (2017). Neuroeducación: Solo se puede aprender aquello que se ama.
Alianza Editorial.
Prince, M. (2020). Does active learning
work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3),
223-231. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jee.2020.93.3
Rutten, N., van Joolingen,
W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2020). The learning effects of
computer simulations in science education. Computers &
Education, 58(1), 136-153. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/cae.2020.58.1
Sousa, D. A. (2022). How the brain learns (6th
ed.). Corwin.
Tokuhama-Espinosa,
T. (2020). Neuromitos en educación: El aprendizaje desde la
neurociencia. Paidós.
Willis, J. (2018). Research-based strategies
to ignite student learning: Insights from neuroscience and the classroom.
ASCD.